OpenAI

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: independent sources +16.3 · number of signals +13.0 · how recent +13.0 · drew on all 3 of its sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: independent sources +16.3 · number of signals +13.0 · how recent +13.0 · drew on all 3 of its sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: spread across geography, teams and function +13.0 · unusual for this entity +13.0 · how recent +13.0 · drew on 2 of its 3 sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: spread across geography, teams and function +13.0 · number of signals +13.0 · how recent +13.0 · drew on 2 of its 3 sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: independent sources +16.3 · number of signals +13.0 · how recent +13.0 · drew on all 3 of its sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: independent sources +16.3 · how far from normal +14.2 · how recent +13.0 · drew on all 3 of its sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: number of signals +13.0 · how recent +13.0 · spread across geography, teams and function +12.2 · drew on 2 of its 3 sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: number of signals +13.0 · how recent +13.0 · spread across geography, teams and function +12.2 · drew on 2 of its 3 sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: how recent +15.0 · unusual for this entity +13.1 · independent sources +12.5 · drew on 2 of its 3 sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: how recent +13.0 · unusual for this entity +11.4 · independent sources +10.9 · drew on 2 of its 3 sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: how recent +13.0 · independent sources +10.9 · unusual for this entity +10.3 · drew on 2 of its 3 sources

Two different questions: how unusual the pattern is, and how well the evidence supports the reading of it. A well-evidenced but ordinary pattern is meant to score low and read confident.

Score driven by: unusual for this entity +15.0 · how recent +11.8 · how far from normal +10.0 · drew on 1 of its 3 sources